[Dev] [RFC] rewording the Social Contract

[Nicolás Reynolds]

"Luke T. Shumaker" <lukeshu at sbcglobal.net> writes:

> So last night/this morning, I threw up a "Nomenclature" page on the
> wiki[0].  The page is mostly meant to be descriptive, not
> prescriptive, but part of its purpose is to standardize.
>
> Then I looked at our Social Contract[1], and noticed that it is not
> consistent with our nomenclature.
>
> Following is my proposal for a new version of the Social Contract.
> The format is Markdown.  MediaWiki's wiki-text sucks for email.

+1 item 2 should also include documentation and other projects alongside
repositories and packages.

should we specify "arch and derivatives" on item 4?

-- 
http://endefensadelsl.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20130707/674a664f/attachment.sig>