From labs at parabola.nu Sat Feb 2 10:33:34 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 02:33:34 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Installation media (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #293] (open) New ISO needed! Message-ID: Issue #293 has been reported by aurelien. ---------------------------------------- Bug #293: New ISO needed! https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/293 Author: aurelien Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: Category: Target version: For many reason we need a new ISO :: - Because of a new Archlinux-keyring - Because of our own Parabola-keyring - Because of GRUB2 At this time our ISO does not offer anymore this way :: https://wiki.parabolagnulinux.org/GRUB2#Parabola_ISO At this time during a "normal" install people complain of the keyring trouble. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Sat Feb 2 11:17:10 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 03:17:10 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Installation media (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #293] New ISO needed! References: Message-ID: Issue #293 has been updated by alfplayer. Assignee set to alfplayer archisobasedir=libre is necessary to loop mount and boot the ISO (bug report: https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/215). The new keyring is not necessary or asked on the installation anymore since mtjm upgraded the mirrorlist package, and his key is on the ISO unlike the previous packager's key. Anyway, I'm working for a new ISO. ---------------------------------------- Bug #293: New ISO needed! https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/293 Author: aurelien Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: alfplayer Category: Target version: For many reason we need a new ISO :: - Because of a new Archlinux-keyring - Because of our own Parabola-keyring - Because of GRUB2 At this time our ISO does not offer anymore this way :: https://wiki.parabolagnulinux.org/GRUB2#Parabola_ISO At this time during a "normal" install people complain of the keyring trouble. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Sat Feb 2 16:46:55 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 08:46:55 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Installation media (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #293] New ISO needed! References: Message-ID: Issue #293 has been updated by aurelien. Nice Alfplayer! Good luck! ---------------------------------------- Bug #293: New ISO needed! https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/293 Author: aurelien Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: alfplayer Category: Target version: For many reason we need a new ISO :: - Because of a new Archlinux-keyring - Because of our own Parabola-keyring - Because of GRUB2 At this time our ISO does not offer anymore this way :: https://wiki.parabolagnulinux.org/GRUB2#Parabola_ISO At this time during a "normal" install people complain of the keyring trouble. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Sun Feb 3 04:22:58 2013 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:22:58 -0300 Subject: [Dev] [Tom Gundersen] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Finally dropping initscripts and rc scripts Message-ID: <87obg2owkd.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> fyi -- :{ -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Tom Gundersen Subject: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Finally dropping initscripts and rc scripts Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 00:18:07 +0100 Size: 1896 URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Wed Feb 6 04:42:48 2013 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:42:48 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Fwd: [Maintenance] Cron sh -c "cd ~/.ssh; git pull origin master" Message-ID: <20130206044247.GX4224@noanoa> welcome encyclomundi and lluvia \o/ (though your ssh keys are missing) ----- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon ----- > Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:17:05 -0800 > From: Cron Daemon > To: maintenance at lists.parabolagnulinux.org > Subject: [Maintenance] Cron sh -c "cd ~/.ssh; git pull > origin master" > > From git://parabolagnulinux.org/hackers > * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD > Updating 943232c..2d9b3f4 > Fast-forward > parabola-keyring/Makefile | 2 +- > parabola-keyring/packager-keyids | 1 + > parabola-keyring/packager/encyclomundi.asc | 30 ++++++++- > parabola-keyring/packager/lluvia.asc | 31 +++++++++ > parabola-keyring/parabola-trusted | 1 + > parabola-keyring/parabola.gpg | 105 +++++++++++++++-------------- > 6 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 parabola-keyring/packager/lluvia.asc > _______________________________________________ > Maintenance mailing list > Maintenance at lists.parabolagnulinux.org > https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/maintenance ----- End forwarded message ----- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: not available URL: From emulatorman at lavabit.com Wed Feb 6 17:52:53 2013 From: emulatorman at lavabit.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:52:53 -0200 Subject: [Dev] Fwd: [Maintenance] Cron sh -c "cd ~/.ssh; git pull origin master" In-Reply-To: <20130206044247.GX4224@noanoa> References: <20130206044247.GX4224@noanoa> Message-ID: <51129875.5000905@lavabit.com> Welcome guys :) > welcome encyclomundi and lluvia \o/ > > (though your ssh keys are missing) > > ----- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon ----- > >> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:17:05 -0800 >> From: Cron Daemon >> To: maintenance at lists.parabolagnulinux.org >> Subject: [Maintenance] Cron sh -c "cd ~/.ssh; git pull >> origin master" >> >> From git://parabolagnulinux.org/hackers >> * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD >> Updating 943232c..2d9b3f4 >> Fast-forward >> parabola-keyring/Makefile | 2 +- >> parabola-keyring/packager-keyids | 1 + >> parabola-keyring/packager/encyclomundi.asc | 30 ++++++++- >> parabola-keyring/packager/lluvia.asc | 31 +++++++++ >> parabola-keyring/parabola-trusted | 1 + >> parabola-keyring/parabola.gpg | 105 +++++++++++++++-------------- >> 6 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 parabola-keyring/packager/lluvia.asc >> _______________________________________________ >> Maintenance mailing list >> Maintenance at lists.parabolagnulinux.org >> https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/maintenance > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabolagnulinux.org > https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 897 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Fri Feb 8 00:28:22 2013 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:28:22 -0300 Subject: [Dev] =?utf-8?q?=5BS=C3=A9bastien_Luttringer=5D_=5Barch-dev-publi?= =?utf-8?q?c=5D_=5BRFC=5D_Add_Wayland/Weston?= Message-ID: <87vca3zm1l.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> fyi -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Luttringer Subject: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Add Wayland/Weston Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 01:23:30 +0100 Size: 1580 URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lukeshu at sbcglobal.net Fri Feb 8 16:09:22 2013 From: lukeshu at sbcglobal.net (Luke T. Shumaker) Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Dev] [RFC] librefetch, a tool to streamline liberated source generation Message-ID: <87ip62lrd9.wl%lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> I have written a tool that I call librefetch that automates the liberated source generation process. It is compatible with both the old mksource method, and the SRCBUILD method. It works by creating a slightly modified makepkg, and creating an SRCBUILD from the PKGBUILD's mksource (or using an existing SRCBUILD). You can then simply add libre://filename.tar.gz to source=(), and it will either fetch an already-created tarball from repo.parabolagnulinux.org, or create it. About using mksource(): 1. You can have makepkg fetch sources for you with the mksource=() array, instead of mucking around with wget. Related: mknoextract, mk*sums work with the mksource array. 2. If mksource() has any dependencies for running, add them to the mkdepends=() array, not depends or makedepends. 3. You can either copy files from ${srcdir} to ${pkgdir} yourself, or directories (but not files) will automatically be copied for you if ${pkgdir} is empty after mksource() is run. The modifications made to makepkg are: 1. Modify create_package() a. don't set pkg_file (so we can set it from the environment) b. do not run check_package c. do not include .{PKGINFO,INSTALL,CHANGELOG} 2. Modify tidy_install a. allow PURGE_TARGETS to contain directories by adding a trailing slash. b. set the time-stamp for all files to "1990-01-01 0:0:0 +0" (so that the output tarball is always identical. 3. Set srcdir and pkgdir differently (src-libre and pkg-libre) 4. Do not run check_build_status To use it: 1. put it somewhere in your PATH 2. Add it to DLAGENTS in makepkg.conf: "libre::$(which librefetch) -p \"\$BUILDFILE\" %u %o" 3. Create /etc/libretools.d/librefetch.conf MIRROR='https://repo.parabolagnulinux.org/sources/' DOWNLOADER='/usr/bin/curl -fLC - --retry 3 --retry-delay 3 -o %o %u' This is my second implementation of the program. The first did some really neat, clever things to load functions from makepkg, and be it's own program. Unfortunately, nitty-gritty details made the program longer than I wanted it to be (if I remove all the necessary hacks, it is a simple, elegant program). This version is simpler by not getting too low-level with makepkg by modifying the PKGBUILD instead. I still couldn't get out of modifying makepkg at all, but this version is simpler and more capable. I included an example PKGBUILD. Note that it requires makepkg-git in order to have an hg+https:// URL in mksource=() Run it with export MAKEPKG=makepkg-git; ${MAKEPKG} If reception of this is positive, I will add it to libretools. I am also open to suggestions for improvements. Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: librefetch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 8252 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PKGBUILD Type: application/octet-stream Size: 816 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mtjm at mtjm.eu Sat Feb 9 10:37:04 2013 From: mtjm at mtjm.eu (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Mas=C5=82owski?=) Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:37:04 +0100 Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILDs for blacklisted packages in abslibre-mips64el Message-ID: <877gmhn57z.fsf@mtjm.eu> Hello. Why has commit 5dd7ed82e788ebad2e920e0f2db7468cc6547cfe introduced PKGBUILDs for all blacklisted packages into abslibre-pre-mips64el (and abslibre-mips64el)? This change has three problems: - many PKGBUILDs are added that shouldn't be used, confusing users and scripts - more merge conflicts (some were deleted from abslibre-mips64el after blacklisting) - some of this software is nonfree, abslibre-mips64el recommends it and makes installing it easier Why don't we use Parabola's abs tree to make abslibre-pre-mips64el? It doesn't have these problems. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar Sat Feb 9 13:29:38 2013 From: fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:29:38 -0300 Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILDs for blacklisted packages in abslibre-mips64el In-Reply-To: <877gmhn57z.fsf@mtjm.eu> References: <877gmhn57z.fsf@mtjm.eu> Message-ID: <87k3qhy5rx.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Micha? Mas?owski writes: > Hello. > > Why has commit 5dd7ed82e788ebad2e920e0f2db7468cc6547cfe introduced > PKGBUILDs for all blacklisted packages into abslibre-pre-mips64el (and > abslibre-mips64el)? > > This change has three problems: > > - many PKGBUILDs are added that shouldn't be used, confusing users and > scripts > > - more merge conflicts (some were deleted from abslibre-mips64el after > blacklisting) > > - some of this software is nonfree, abslibre-mips64el recommends it and > makes installing it easier > > Why don't we use Parabola's abs tree to make abslibre-pre-mips64el? It > doesn't have these problems. The script that makes ABSLibre also creates abslibre-pre-mips64el based on its results. If PKGBUILDs for unfree software appeared on one they most likely appeared at the other. It's been working correctly for more than two years... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: From labs at parabola.nu Tue Feb 12 15:49:51 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:49:51 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Freedom issue #294] (open) Remove pypy from blacklist Message-ID: Issue #294 has been reported by johkra. ---------------------------------------- Freedom issue #294: Remove pypy from blacklist https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/294 Author: johkra Status: open Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Older versions of pypy included pstats.py[1] and profile.py[2] with a problematic license. With version 2.0 beta 1 (available from the Arch repos) these files have been relicensed under the Apache 2 license. Unless there are other freedom issues (these are the ones given to me when I last asked about it), it would be nice if pypy could be removed from the blacklist. [1] https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/07e08e9c885ca67d89bcc304e45a32346daea2fa/lib-python/2.7/pstats.py?at=release-2.0-beta-1 [2] https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/07e08e9c885ca67d89bcc304e45a32346daea2fa/lib-python/2.7/profile.py?at=release-2.0-beta-1 -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Tue Feb 12 16:21:28 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:21:28 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Freedom issue #294] Remove pypy from blacklist References: Message-ID: Issue #294 has been updated by mtjm. The PyPy source tarball has two JARs (pypy/translator/jvm/src/jna.jar and pypy/translator/jvm/src/jasmin.jar). Can you find their source code, check their licenses and make the PKGBUILD build them from source (preferably using them from separate packages)? ---------------------------------------- Freedom issue #294: Remove pypy from blacklist https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/294 Author: johkra Status: open Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Older versions of pypy included pstats.py[1] and profile.py[2] with a problematic license. With version 2.0 beta 1 (available from the Arch repos) these files have been relicensed under the Apache 2 license. Unless there are other freedom issues (these are the ones given to me when I last asked about it), it would be nice if pypy could be removed from the blacklist. [1] https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/07e08e9c885ca67d89bcc304e45a32346daea2fa/lib-python/2.7/pstats.py?at=release-2.0-beta-1 [2] https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/07e08e9c885ca67d89bcc304e45a32346daea2fa/lib-python/2.7/profile.py?at=release-2.0-beta-1 -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Tue Feb 12 18:53:26 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:53:26 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Freedom issue #294] Remove pypy from blacklist References: Message-ID: Issue #294 has been updated by johkra. File SRCBUILD added File PKGBUILD added Both of these files are not needed and not used during the build. I do not know how we handle extraneous non-free files in the source tarball if the resulting package is not at all affected by it. I personally would keep the Arch packages in the repos, but fix the PKGBUILD in abs-libre. I've attached a SRCBUILD which deletes these files and the adapted PKGBUILD to this comment. I've also put the cleaned source tarball at http://parabolaweb.eu/src/pypy-2.0beta1-1-any.src.tar.xz . ---------------------------------------- Freedom issue #294: Remove pypy from blacklist https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/294 Author: johkra Status: open Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Older versions of pypy included pstats.py[1] and profile.py[2] with a problematic license. With version 2.0 beta 1 (available from the Arch repos) these files have been relicensed under the Apache 2 license. Unless there are other freedom issues (these are the ones given to me when I last asked about it), it would be nice if pypy could be removed from the blacklist. [1] https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/07e08e9c885ca67d89bcc304e45a32346daea2fa/lib-python/2.7/pstats.py?at=release-2.0-beta-1 [2] https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/07e08e9c885ca67d89bcc304e45a32346daea2fa/lib-python/2.7/profile.py?at=release-2.0-beta-1 -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Wed Feb 13 14:02:45 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:02:45 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #295] (open) Remove Wayland from pcr due to the inclusion in [community] Message-ID: Issue #295 has been reported by g.one. ---------------------------------------- Bug #295: Remove Wayland from pcr due to the inclusion in [community] https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/295 Author: g.one Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: Category: Target version: You should remove Wayland from pcr because an updated version is mantained in the community repository. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Wed Feb 13 14:12:25 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:12:25 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Freedom issue #288] Hydrogen allow to install non-free drumkits References: Message-ID: Issue #288 has been updated by g.one. Just one thing: every time when hydrogen-libre will be updated or periodically, please check in http://www.hydrogen-music.org/feeds/drumkit_list.php if there are new libre drumkits to add in http://repo.parabolagnulinux.org/other/hydrogen-libre/feeds/drumkit_list.php Thanks! ---------------------------------------- Freedom issue #288: Hydrogen allow to install non-free drumkits https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/288 Author: g.one Status: fixed Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Emulatorman Category: Target version: I wanna try to talk with you about a possible solution for this issue. Hydrogen is a free (as in speech) software but it allow the installation of non-free drumkits from the official drumkit repositories mantained by Hydrogen community. My proposal is: can we re-build Hydrogen as hydrogen-libre and point the drumkits repo url to a parabola repo with only free licensed drumkits? -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Wed Feb 13 16:08:56 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:08:56 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #295] Remove Wayland from pcr due to the inclusion in [community] References: Message-ID: Issue #295 has been updated by Emulatorman. Assignee set to Jorginho ---------------------------------------- Bug #295: Remove Wayland from pcr due to the inclusion in [community] https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/295 Author: g.one Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: Jorginho Category: Target version: You should remove Wayland from pcr because an updated version is mantained in the community repository. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Wed Feb 13 16:16:52 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:16:52 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #295] (fixed) Remove Wayland from pcr due to the inclusion in [community] References: Message-ID: Issue #295 has been updated by Jorginho. Status changed from open to fixed ---------------------------------------- Bug #295: Remove Wayland from pcr due to the inclusion in [community] https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/295 Author: g.one Status: fixed Priority: bug Assignee: Jorginho Category: Target version: You should remove Wayland from pcr because an updated version is mantained in the community repository. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Wed Feb 13 20:24:18 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:24:18 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #295] Remove Wayland from pcr due to the inclusion in [community] References: Message-ID: Issue #295 has been updated by g.one. Sorry, the package is in [extra] and not in [community], but i think is ok now. ---------------------------------------- Bug #295: Remove Wayland from pcr due to the inclusion in [community] https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/295 Author: g.one Status: fixed Priority: bug Assignee: Jorginho Category: Target version: You should remove Wayland from pcr because an updated version is mantained in the community repository. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From jorgean at lavabit.com Fri Feb 15 15:28:31 2013 From: jorgean at lavabit.com (Jorge Araya Navarro) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:28:31 -0600 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Freedom issue #288] Hydrogen allow to install non-free drumkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <511E541F.5070407@lavabit.com> El 13/02/2013 08:12, labs at parabola.nu escribi?: > > Issue #288 has been updated by g.one. > > > Just one thing: every time when hydrogen-libre will be updated or periodically, please check in http://www.hydrogen-music.org/feeds/drumkit_list.php if there are new libre drumkits to add in http://repo.parabolagnulinux.org/other/hydrogen-libre/feeds/drumkit_list.php > > Thanks! > ---------------------------------------- > Freedom issue #288: Hydrogen allow to install non-free drumkits > https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/288 > > Author: g.one > Status: fixed > Priority: freedom issue > Assignee: Emulatorman > Category: > Target version: > > > I wanna try to talk with you about a possible solution for this issue. > Hydrogen is a free (as in speech) software but it allow the installation of non-free drumkits from the official drumkit repositories mantained by Hydrogen community. > My proposal is: can we re-build Hydrogen as hydrogen-libre and point the drumkits repo url to a parabola repo with only free licensed drumkits? > > > > -- > You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. > To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabolagnulinux.org > https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Well we got you covered with great videos and articles demystifying women on a > variety of important topics. > http://click.lavabit.com/hkkmu4bqibreet6rop8bcunc59q6uz17m1r8mw9kp854935kj73y/ > ____________________________________________________________________________________ if such drum kits aren't under CC BY NC or a Copyright license, they don't need to be take out of the package. -- Jorge Araya Navarro Universitario, idealista y activista del Software Libre. Siquirres, Lim?n, Costa Rica. http://swt.encyclomundi.net Diaspora*: http://diasp.org/u/shackra identi.ca: http://parlementum.net/sweet Jabber: shackra at jabberes.org Skype: ?De ninguna manera, tras de privativo, te esp?an!. El software privativo en GNU/Linux, al igual que en Windows o en MacOs, te hace un ser no-libre. Deja de enga?arte, ??despierta ahora!!: http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html http://replicant.us/about/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From labs at parabola.nu Fri Feb 15 18:29:42 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:29:42 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Freedom issue #288] Hydrogen allow to install non-free drumkits References: Message-ID: Issue #288 has been updated by shackra. if such drum kits aren't under CC BY NC or a Copyright license, they don't need to be take out of the package. ---------------------------------------- Freedom issue #288: Hydrogen allow to install non-free drumkits https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/288 Author: g.one Status: fixed Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Emulatorman Category: Target version: I wanna try to talk with you about a possible solution for this issue. Hydrogen is a free (as in speech) software but it allow the installation of non-free drumkits from the official drumkit repositories mantained by Hydrogen community. My proposal is: can we re-build Hydrogen as hydrogen-libre and point the drumkits repo url to a parabola repo with only free licensed drumkits? -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Sun Feb 17 22:42:45 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:42:45 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #296] (open) Grub error Message-ID: Issue #296 has been reported by g.one. ---------------------------------------- Bug #296: Grub error https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/296 Author: g.one Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: Category: Target version: Since i updated grub-bios to the 2.00-1.2 version i have this error at the grub startup: error: file '/boot/grub/locale/en.mo.gz' -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Sun Feb 17 23:19:44 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:19:44 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #296] Grub error References: Message-ID: Issue #296 has been updated by alfplayer. You can try this: cp /usr/share/locale/en\@quot/LC_MESSAGES/grub.mo /boot/grub/locale/en.mo https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?35880 (it's been almost a year since it was reported). ---------------------------------------- Bug #296: Grub error https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/296 Author: g.one Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: Category: Target version: Since i updated grub-bios to the 2.00-1.2 version i have this error at the grub startup: error: file '/boot/grub/locale/en.mo.gz' -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Mon Feb 18 10:01:36 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:01:36 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Freedom issue #294] Remove pypy from blacklist References: Message-ID: Issue #294 has been updated by johkra. Anything more I can do to get this resolved? ---------------------------------------- Freedom issue #294: Remove pypy from blacklist https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/294 Author: johkra Status: open Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Older versions of pypy included pstats.py[1] and profile.py[2] with a problematic license. With version 2.0 beta 1 (available from the Arch repos) these files have been relicensed under the Apache 2 license. Unless there are other freedom issues (these are the ones given to me when I last asked about it), it would be nice if pypy could be removed from the blacklist. [1] https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/07e08e9c885ca67d89bcc304e45a32346daea2fa/lib-python/2.7/pstats.py?at=release-2.0-beta-1 [2] https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/07e08e9c885ca67d89bcc304e45a32346daea2fa/lib-python/2.7/profile.py?at=release-2.0-beta-1 -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Mon Feb 18 20:24:44 2013 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:24:44 -0300 Subject: [Dev] =?utf-8?q?=5BBart=C5=82omiej_Piotrowski=5D_=5Barch-dev-publ?= =?utf-8?q?ic=5D_=5BRFC=5D_Migration_to_MariaDB?= Message-ID: <87621p2wvn.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> FYI -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: =?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUGlvdHJvd3NraQ==?= Subject: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Migration to MariaDB Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:42:24 +0100 Size: 6299 URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: From labs at parabola.nu Tue Feb 19 14:37:07 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:37:07 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #296] Grub error References: Message-ID: Issue #296 has been updated by Emulatorman. Did you tried to type "grub-install /dev/sdX" before "grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg"? In some cases some users had grub-2.00rc1 version inside MBR yet and doesn't typed grub-install after grub upgrading version. ---------------------------------------- Bug #296: Grub error https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/296 Author: g.one Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: Category: Target version: Since i updated grub-bios to the 2.00-1.2 version i have this error at the grub startup: error: file '/boot/grub/locale/en.mo.gz' -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Tue Feb 19 19:03:22 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:03:22 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #296] Grub error References: Message-ID: Issue #296 has been updated by g.one. Solved (i think) with this https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Grub#Install_to_440-byte_MBR_boot_code_region # modprobe dm-mod # grub-install --target=i386-pc --boot-directory=/boot --recheck --debug /dev/sda # mkdir -p /boot/grub/locale # cp /usr/share/locale/en\@quot/LC_MESSAGES/grub.mo /boot/grub/locale/en.mo ---------------------------------------- Bug #296: Grub error https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/296 Author: g.one Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: Category: Target version: Since i updated grub-bios to the 2.00-1.2 version i have this error at the grub startup: error: file '/boot/grub/locale/en.mo.gz' -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Wed Feb 20 19:10:00 2013 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:10:00 -0300 Subject: [Dev] [Andreas Radke] [arch-dev-public] dropping OpenJDK6 by the end of this month Message-ID: <87a9qy2453.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> FYI -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Andreas Radke Subject: [arch-dev-public] dropping OpenJDK6 by the end of this month Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:47:32 +0100 Size: 4298 URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Thu Feb 21 16:08:28 2013 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:08:28 -0300 Subject: [Dev] certificates have been renewed Message-ID: <87ppztzm2r.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> i've renewed certificates for the following hosts: parabolagnulinux.org parabola.nu *.parabolagnulinux.org and reloaded nginx (on both servers) and prosody. is something else using tls? if not, why not? :P ps: hitting "renew" on cacert doesn't work, we have to generate a new csr using the host key. certtool -q --load-privkey=$host.key --outfile=$host.$today.csr -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mtjm at mtjm.eu Thu Feb 21 16:29:27 2013 From: mtjm at mtjm.eu (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Mas=C5=82owski?=) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:29:27 +0100 Subject: [Dev] certificates have been renewed In-Reply-To: <87ppztzm2r.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Nicol=C3=A1?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= Reynolds"'s message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:08:28 -0300") References: <87ppztzm2r.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87ehg9eil4.fsf@glorfindel.Home> > and reloaded nginx (on both servers) and prosody. is something else > using tls? if not, why not? :P postfix on repo should be. > ps: hitting "renew" on cacert doesn't work, we have to generate a new > csr using the host key. > > certtool -q --load-privkey=$host.key --outfile=$host.$today.csr Do we have a policy of replacing private keys? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar Thu Feb 21 16:40:56 2013 From: fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:40:56 -0300 Subject: [Dev] certificates have been renewed In-Reply-To: <87ehg9eil4.fsf@glorfindel.Home> References: <87ppztzm2r.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87ehg9eil4.fsf@glorfindel.Home> Message-ID: <87k3q1zkkn.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Micha? Mas?owski writes: >> and reloaded nginx (on both servers) and prosody. is something else >> using tls? if not, why not? :P > > postfix on repo should be. have you restarted it? >> ps: hitting "renew" on cacert doesn't work, we have to generate a new >> csr using the host key. >> >> certtool -q --load-privkey=$host.key --outfile=$host.$today.csr > > Do we have a policy of replacing private keys? i didn't replace them, but we have a key per host while we can have just a parabola key (easier on configs?). what are you thinking? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mtjm at mtjm.eu Thu Feb 21 17:00:17 2013 From: mtjm at mtjm.eu (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Mas=C5=82owski?=) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:00:17 +0100 Subject: [Dev] certificates have been renewed In-Reply-To: <87k3q1zkkn.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Nicol=C3=A1?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= Reynolds"'s message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:40:56 -0300") References: <87ppztzm2r.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87ehg9eil4.fsf@glorfindel.Home> <87k3q1zkkn.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87a9qxeh5q.fsf@glorfindel.Home> >> postfix on repo should be. > > have you restarted it? It uses these files: -rw------- 1 root root 3247 Sep 28 2011 /etc/ssl/private/mail.parabolagnulinux.org.key -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1830 Sep 28 2011 /etc/ssl/certs/mail.parabolagnulinux.org.crt This doesn't suggest them being updated, we could remove them and use the *.parabolagnulinux.org certificates. Dovecot is configured to use it too, although with all protocols disabled it's not needed (it provides only authentication for Postfix). >> Do we have a policy of replacing private keys? > > i didn't replace them, but we have a key per host while we can have just > a parabola key (easier on configs?). what are you thinking? We could have one key pair at once on both servers, renew the public key once per six months and replace the private key once or twice per year. Having more than one key per server leads to forgotten keys like the mail one. Two separate keys one for each server will have overlapping names, so they shouldn't be more secure than one key for both. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar Thu Feb 21 18:13:13 2013 From: fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:13:13 -0300 Subject: [Dev] certificates have been renewed In-Reply-To: <87a9qxeh5q.fsf@glorfindel.Home> References: <87ppztzm2r.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87ehg9eil4.fsf@glorfindel.Home> <87k3q1zkkn.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87a9qxeh5q.fsf@glorfindel.Home> Message-ID: <87ehg9zgau.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Micha? Mas?owski writes: >>> postfix on repo should be. >> >> have you restarted it? > > It uses these files: > -rw------- 1 root root 3247 Sep 28 2011 /etc/ssl/private/mail.parabolagnulinux.org.key > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1830 Sep 28 2011 /etc/ssl/certs/mail.parabolagnulinux.org.crt > > This doesn't suggest them being updated, we could remove them and use > the *.parabolagnulinux.org certificates. no, i just renewed the keys i mentioned > Dovecot is configured to use it too, although with all protocols > disabled it's not needed (it provides only authentication for Postfix). > >>> Do we have a policy of replacing private keys? >> >> i didn't replace them, but we have a key per host while we can have just >> a parabola key (easier on configs?). what are you thinking? > > We could have one key pair at once on both servers, renew the public key > once per six months and replace the private key once or twice per year. > Having more than one key per server leads to forgotten keys like the > mail one. Two separate keys one for each server will have overlapping > names, so they shouldn't be more secure than one key for both. why would it be necessary to change keys? for security problems? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mtjm at mtjm.eu Thu Feb 21 21:15:17 2013 From: mtjm at mtjm.eu (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Mas=C5=82owski?=) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:15:17 +0100 Subject: [Dev] certificates have been renewed In-Reply-To: <87ehg9zgau.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Nicol=C3=A1?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= Reynolds"'s message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:13:13 -0300") References: <87ppztzm2r.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87ehg9eil4.fsf@glorfindel.Home> <87k3q1zkkn.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87a9qxeh5q.fsf@glorfindel.Home> <87ehg9zgau.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87621le5cq.fsf@glorfindel.Home> >> This doesn't suggest them being updated, we could remove them and use >> the *.parabolagnulinux.org certificates. > > no, i just renewed the keys i mentioned Ok, I've changed it to use the wildcard certificate. >> We could have one key pair at once on both servers, renew the public key >> once per six months and replace the private key once or twice per year. >> Having more than one key per server leads to forgotten keys like the >> mail one. Two separate keys one for each server will have overlapping >> names, so they shouldn't be more secure than one key for both. > > why would it be necessary to change keys? for security problems? I don't remember where I have read that it's useful for security. It's not harder to replace both keys from user's usability point of view. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: From labs at parabola.nu Sat Feb 23 21:26:15 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:26:15 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #271] [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available References: Message-ID: Issue #271 has been updated by mtjm. Priority changed from bug to freedom issue cdrtools-3.01 has the same Apple license issue that cdrkit-libre solves. It also has a GPL-licensed mkisofs linking to a CDDL-licensed library. We should blacklist it. ---------------------------------------- Bug #271: [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/271 Author: mtjm Status: open Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Check if the reasons to blacklist cdrkit or the reasons for Debian to fork it apply to current cdrtools and maybe blacklist it. Reported by drtan on #parabola. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Sun Feb 24 00:03:09 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:03:09 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #271] [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available References: Message-ID: Issue #271 has been updated by Emulatorman. ok, i will do it ---------------------------------------- Bug #271: [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/271 Author: mtjm Status: open Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Check if the reasons to blacklist cdrkit or the reasons for Debian to fork it apply to current cdrtools and maybe blacklist it. Reported by drtan on #parabola. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Sun Feb 24 04:11:45 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:11:45 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #271] (fixed) [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available References: Message-ID: Issue #271 has been updated by Emulatorman. Status changed from open to fixed I made changes on cdrkit removing 'cdrtools' on replace, provides and conflicts line due that it has reverse conflict from cdrtools. Meanwhile, i put cdrtools on blacklist and it was replaced by cdrtools-libre [0] [0] https://projects.parabolagnulinux.org/abslibre.git/commit/?id=5ae861467a57666f4b975f308b8c8142ce47d18a ---------------------------------------- Bug #271: [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/271 Author: mtjm Status: fixed Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Check if the reasons to blacklist cdrkit or the reasons for Debian to fork it apply to current cdrtools and maybe blacklist it. Reported by drtan on #parabola. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Sun Feb 24 11:15:55 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:15:55 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #271] (in progress) [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available References: Message-ID: Issue #271 has been updated by mtjm. Status changed from fixed to in progress See e.g. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#cdrtools for why other distros do not include it. Is there a reason to keep it here? ---------------------------------------- Bug #271: [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/271 Author: mtjm Status: in progress Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Check if the reasons to blacklist cdrkit or the reasons for Debian to fork it apply to current cdrtools and maybe blacklist it. Reported by drtan on #parabola. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Sun Feb 24 13:24:35 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:24:35 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #271] [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available References: Message-ID: Issue #271 has been updated by Emulatorman. ah ok mtjm, so due that cdrtools has an incompatible mix of the GPL and the CDDL, it will be removed from our distro. thanks for the information. ---------------------------------------- Bug #271: [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/271 Author: mtjm Status: in progress Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Check if the reasons to blacklist cdrkit or the reasons for Debian to fork it apply to current cdrtools and maybe blacklist it. Reported by drtan on #parabola. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Mon Feb 25 11:57:05 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 03:57:05 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #297] (open) blender-libre unable to start because of missing *.so files in opencollada Message-ID: Issue #297 has been reported by camurp0. ---------------------------------------- Bug #297: blender-libre unable to start because of missing *.so files in opencollada https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/297 Author: camurp0 Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: Category: Target version: When starting blender from the libre/blender-libre package, it gives only this message, then fails: 
$ blender
blender: error while loading shared libraries: libOpenCOLLADAStreamWriter.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
$
Blender seems to require the shared object (*.so) files for opencollada, but community/opencollada doesn't seem to include those. It only includes the *.a files, which are found in /usr/lib/opencollada . Reinstalling the two packages didn't change the result. I am not sure how to solve this problem. To replicate this: # Install libre/blender-libre (this installs community/opencollada as a dependency) # Run /usr/bin/blender from a terminal. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Mon Feb 25 15:27:27 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:27:27 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #271] (fixed) [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available References: Message-ID: Issue #271 has been updated by Emulatorman. Status changed from in progress to fixed cdrtools was included on blacklist, cdrtools-libre was removed due that source code has a mix of incompatibility licenses, so it don't can be resolved. cdrkit-libre is the free alternative of cdrkit and cdrtools on Parabola (cdrtools was included on conflict, provides and replace line of cdrkit-libre again). Solved! ---------------------------------------- Bug #271: [cdrkit-libre] replaces [cdrtools] while both packages are available https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/271 Author: mtjm Status: fixed Priority: freedom issue Assignee: Category: Target version: Check if the reasons to blacklist cdrkit or the reasons for Debian to fork it apply to current cdrtools and maybe blacklist it. Reported by drtan on #parabola. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account From labs at parabola.nu Mon Feb 25 15:30:58 2013 From: labs at parabola.nu (labs at parabola.nu) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:30:58 -0800 Subject: [Dev] [Packages (i686 and x86_64) - Bug #297] blender-libre unable to start because of missing *.so files in opencollada References: Message-ID: Issue #297 has been updated by coadde. Assignee set to coadde ---------------------------------------- Bug #297: blender-libre unable to start because of missing *.so files in opencollada https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/297 Author: camurp0 Status: open Priority: bug Assignee: coadde Category: Target version: When starting blender from the libre/blender-libre package, it gives only this message, then fails: 
$ blender
blender: error while loading shared libraries: libOpenCOLLADAStreamWriter.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
$
Blender seems to require the shared object (*.so) files for opencollada, but community/opencollada doesn't seem to include those. It only includes the *.a files, which are found in /usr/lib/opencollada . Reinstalling the two packages didn't change the result. I am not sure how to solve this problem. To replicate this: # Install libre/blender-libre (this installs community/opencollada as a dependency) # Run /usr/bin/blender from a terminal. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://labs.parabola.nu/my/account