[Dev] [RFC] Package freedom requirements clarification

[Michał Masłowski]

> I agree with this course of action. One question tough: Would this
> require us to maintain a public repo with non-free sources?

It wouldn't, we would provide the sources with nonfree parts removed,
like Debian does (they too have rules to remove them in their packages).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20121125/edc743b9/attachment.sig>