[Dev] Fwd: Re: [arch-dev-public] libdeps (was: ffmpeg 0.8 and x264)

Nicolás Reynolds fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar
Mon Oct 31 15:49:40 GMT 2011


pay attention to the reply :P

----- Forwarded message from Pierre Schmitz <pierre at archlinux.de> -----

> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:00:19 +0100
> From: Pierre Schmitz <pierre at archlinux.de>
> To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development
> 	<arch-dev-public at archlinux.org>
> Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] libdeps (was: ffmpeg 0.8 and x264)
> User-Agent: telnet
> 
> Am 31.10.2011 15:52, schrieb Florian Pritz:
> > On 31.10.2011 15:04, Ionut Biru wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> we didn't had a large rebuild for a long time now.
> >>
> >> i the same time i pushed a new x264 as well.
> >>
> >> happy compiling.
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > If you want to, you can try libdeps (previously called sodeps) with this
> > rebuild.
> 
> I'd say we shouldn't start using this randomly on packages now. there
> are a few examples where sodeps might be useful; e.g. for pacman and its
> deps. So especially for packages that are not in [core] I would consider
> not using it.
> 
> It makes things more complicated and solves a problem we don't really
> have. It's also not useful to introduce it for just one lib. It's
> probably needed for the whole dependency subtree of a package. I hope
> this explanation will do for now :-)
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Pierre
> 
> -- 
> Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com
> 

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Salud!
Nicolás Reynolds,
xmpp:fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar
omb:http://identi.ca/fauno

OTR: C0CB1F0F 01DB5E18 2D634C2A A4626858 E7C7C3A2

http://parabolagnulinux.org
http://endefensadelsl.org

"Freedom [...] is messy" ~ Eben Moglen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20111031/3cc48806/attachment.sig>


More information about the Dev mailing list