[Dev] gcc update status?

[Nicolás Reynolds]

El 15/11/11 02:06, Michał Masłowski dijo:
> > do we have a list of this packages?
> 
> I made a new chroot with base, installation of many packages fails and
> it cannot be chrooted to.
> 
> These packages certainly need rebuild:
> 
> util-linux
> binutils
> bash
> coreutils
> 
> There are many other packages using /lib32/ld.so.1 (running e.g. "objdump
> -sj .interp bin/bash" shows if bin/bash does), some are already outdated
> (like KDE 4.7.2), some will be in near future, so I don't consider
> rebuilding them now to be the best solution.
> 
> We should normally update new packages using a chroot with /lib32 being
> a symlink to /lib (and with newest pacman and gcc, since these
> previously made new packages use lib32), and later check packages for
> files in /usr/lib32, /lib32 or for binaries using /lib32/ld.so.1 and
> rebuild them.

a breeze with fullpkg :D

i'll rebuild the ones from [core]


-- 
Salud!
Nicolás Reynolds,
xmpp:fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar
omb:http://identi.ca/fauno

OTR: C0CB1F0F 01DB5E18 2D634C2A A4626858 E7C7C3A2

http://parabolagnulinux.org
http://endefensadelsl.org

"Freedom [...] is messy" ~ Eben Moglen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20111115/4d78958b/attachment.sig>