[Dev] gcc update status?

Nicolás Reynolds fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar
Tue Nov 15 01:29:41 GMT 2011

El 14/11/11 09:29, Michał Masłowski dijo:
> > How did the mips64el gcc update go? Is it safe for me to upgrade?
> It's probably safe (I updated it on my system, or maybe only on the
> chroot).  If you have gNS or another system still installed, it
> shouldn't cause problems.
> If you have /lib32 or /usr/lib32 symlinked to the non-32 directories,
> pacman won't know this and will consider the update to replace files not
> owned by other packages.  Running pacman -S --force glibc did not break
> my system, the other packages affected probably are less necessary.
> The /lib32 symlink is still needed, many programs specify /lib32/ld.so.1
> as their linked.  Some packages put their libraries in /lib32 or
> /usr/lib32, they will also be rebuilt.

do we have a list of this packages?

Nicolás Reynolds,
xmpp:fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar

OTR: C0CB1F0F 01DB5E18 2D634C2A A4626858 E7C7C3A2


"Freedom [...] is messy" ~ Eben Moglen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20111114/e7c9511b/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list