[Assist] Fwd: Re: Telegram & Non-Free SaaSS
brettg at posteo.net
Mon Jul 16 02:59:07 BST 2018
> ring is working on offline messages for their next release - i
> not asked how it will be implememted - maybe on the blockchain?
I am not aware of the specifics, either. But I was under the
that even XMPP has an asynchronous messaging feature. Maybe I am
> the main issue with a mediator is of course, privacy more than
> - as for the FSDG, the more important concern is the issue of
> server sending scripts willy-nilly to clients - that is a trend
> is likely to continue and grow in the future - a practice that
> it is
> probably safe to say the original creators of the good 'ol IRC,
> XMPP protocols would have considered as insideous
The orthogonal point to this could be made for youtube-dl.
FSF has corrected their former statement of youtube-dl fetching
executing non-free JS to fetching and parsing non-free JS, the
Telegram here is sort of under the same umbrella.
If Telegram works to communicate with a server that runs software
is freedom restricting by the nature of the service (although, I
concede that RMS is correct in stating that a service should not
judged by the ability of a user to audit its contents), I wonder
Telegram falls under the guidelines of what the FSF would consider
In an alternate dimension, the point here would be moot because
would not work in such a way.
Brett M. Gilio
Free Software Foundation, Member
https://parabola.nu | https://emacs.org
More information about the Assist