From elcorreo at deshackra.com Mon Jul 3 06:43:34 2017 From: elcorreo at deshackra.com (Jorge Araya Navarro) Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 23:43:34 -0600 Subject: [Assist] Can't boot, no luks map Message-ID: Hello, After updating yesterday and rebooting today the issue were my LVM is not available for mounting and booting the system, leaving me in an emergency shell. From the emergency shell I see /dev/mapper have only the 'control' directory. After doing cryptsetup open /dev/sda1 lvm I can see my lvm stuff is available on /dev/mapper as 'root' and 'swapvol'. Everything was working fine until now, entering into the system with arch-chroot and doing mkinitcpio -P helps nothing, neither updating the grub configuration with grub-mkconfig and updating the files in the Libreboot rom. Any help? -- Enviado desde mi dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Por favor, disculpa mi brevedad. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nathan at relapsus.com Mon Jul 3 14:16:06 2017 From: nathan at relapsus.com (Nathan Edson) Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:16:06 -0700 Subject: [Assist] Can't boot, no luks map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On July 2, 2017 10:43:34 PM PDT, Jorge Araya Navarro wrote: >Hello, > >After updating yesterday and rebooting today the issue were my LVM is >not available for mounting and booting the system, leaving me in an >emergency shell. > >From the emergency shell I see /dev/mapper have only the 'control' >directory. After doing cryptsetup open /dev/sda1 lvm I can see my lvm >stuff is available on /dev/mapper as 'root' and 'swapvol'. > >Everything was working fine until now, entering into the system with >arch-chroot and doing mkinitcpio -P helps nothing, neither updating the >grub configuration with grub-mkconfig and updating the files in the >Libreboot rom. > >Any help? >-- >Enviado desde mi dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Por favor, disculpa >mi brevedad. I am having the same issue. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From elcorreo at deshackra.com Mon Jul 3 15:50:05 2017 From: elcorreo at deshackra.com (Jorge Araya Navarro) Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 08:50:05 -0600 Subject: [Assist] Can't boot, no luks map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I updated lvm2 today with no success :( El 3 de julio de 2017 7:16:06 GMT-06:00, Nathan Edson escribi?: > > >On July 2, 2017 10:43:34 PM PDT, Jorge Araya Navarro > wrote: >>Hello, >> >>After updating yesterday and rebooting today the issue were my LVM is >>not available for mounting and booting the system, leaving me in an >>emergency shell. >> >>From the emergency shell I see /dev/mapper have only the 'control' >>directory. After doing cryptsetup open /dev/sda1 lvm I can see my lvm >>stuff is available on /dev/mapper as 'root' and 'swapvol'. >> >>Everything was working fine until now, entering into the system with >>arch-chroot and doing mkinitcpio -P helps nothing, neither updating >the >>grub configuration with grub-mkconfig and updating the files in the >>Libreboot rom. >> >>Any help? >>-- >>Enviado desde mi dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Por favor, disculpa >>mi brevedad. > >I am having the same issue. -- Enviado desde mi dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Por favor, disculpa mi brevedad. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nathan at relapsus.com Mon Jul 3 18:47:38 2017 From: nathan at relapsus.com (Nathan Edson) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:47:38 -0700 Subject: [Assist] Can't boot, no luks map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20170703174738.GA939@librex60.localdomain> Hello, I am guessing that you are using a key file to unlock boot? This saves you from entering the password to unlock your disc twice (once in grub, once while booting)? I think this is where I am having an issue. I can boot the system by booting manually at the grub shell: grub> cryptomount -a grub> set root='lvm/matrix-root' grub> linux /boot/vmlinuz-linux-libre-lts root=/dev/matrix/root cryptdevice=/dev/sda1:root grub> initrd /boot/initramfs-linux-libre-lts.img grub> boot I am also able to boot by editing my grub entry. Specifically by removing: cryptkey=rootfs:/etc/mykeyfile I am still trying to determine what changed during the last update. On 07/03/17 - 08:50am, Jorge Araya Navarro wrote: > I updated lvm2 today with no success :( > > El 3 de julio de 2017 7:16:06 GMT-06:00, Nathan Edson escribi?: > > > > > >On July 2, 2017 10:43:34 PM PDT, Jorge Araya Navarro > > wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>After updating yesterday and rebooting today the issue were my LVM is > >>not available for mounting and booting the system, leaving me in an > >>emergency shell. > >> > >>From the emergency shell I see /dev/mapper have only the 'control' > >>directory. After doing cryptsetup open /dev/sda1 lvm I can see my lvm > >>stuff is available on /dev/mapper as 'root' and 'swapvol'. > >> > >>Everything was working fine until now, entering into the system with > >>arch-chroot and doing mkinitcpio -P helps nothing, neither updating > >the > >>grub configuration with grub-mkconfig and updating the files in the > >>Libreboot rom. > >> > >>Any help? > >>-- > >>Enviado desde mi dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Por favor, disculpa > >>mi brevedad. > > > >I am having the same issue. > > -- > Enviado desde mi dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Por favor, disculpa mi brevedad. -- Nathan GPG: 42AD 5FB1 4EC0 4AF7 0457 D9B8 5F3E 4106 A182 2BB5 From isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info Mon Jul 3 20:43:23 2017 From: isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info (Isaac David) Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Assist] Can't boot, no luks map In-Reply-To: <20170703174738.GA939@librex60.localdomain> References: <20170703174738.GA939@librex60.localdomain> Message-ID: <1499111003.1749.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Nathan Edson : > I am also able to boot by editing my grub entry. Specifically by > removing: > > cryptkey=rootfs:/etc/mykeyfile > > I am still trying to determine what changed during the last update. mkinitcpio-busybox according to this report: https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/2017-June/005649.html i was expecting to be forced to downgrade like everyone else after installing the new mkinitcpio-busybox yesterday, and to my surprise it didn't break the encrypt hook. now i realize there's no cryptkey parameter in my kernel line, as i always used default keyfile name: /crypto_keyfile.bin -- Isaac David GPG: 38D33EF29A7691134357648733466E12EC7BA943 Tox: 0C730E0156E96E6193A1445D413557FF5F277BA969A4EA20AC9352889D3B390E77651E816F0C From nathan at relapsus.com Mon Jul 3 21:55:17 2017 From: nathan at relapsus.com (Nathan Edson) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:55:17 -0700 Subject: [Assist] Can't boot, no luks map In-Reply-To: <1499111003.1749.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> References: <20170703174738.GA939@librex60.localdomain> <1499111003.1749.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Message-ID: <20170703205517.GA8227@librex60.localdomain> On 07/03/17 - 02:43pm, Isaac David wrote: > Nathan Edson : > > I am also able to boot by editing my grub entry. Specifically by > > removing: > > > > cryptkey=rootfs:/etc/mykeyfile > > > > I am still trying to determine what changed during the last update. > > mkinitcpio-busybox according to this report: > > https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/2017-June/005649.html > > i was expecting to be forced to downgrade like everyone else > after installing the new mkinitcpio-busybox yesterday, and to > my surprise it didn't break the encrypt hook. > > now i realize there's no cryptkey parameter in my kernel > line, as i always used default keyfile name: /crypto_keyfile.bin Does the encrypt hook automagically trigger looking for crypto_keyfile.bin? If so, that will be a simple fix. Many thanks for helping me identify the troublesome package. The power of community is truly amazing. -- Nathan GPG: 42AD 5FB1 4EC0 4AF7 0457 D9B8 5F3E 4106 A182 2BB5 From lukeshu at lukeshu.com Fri Jul 14 23:46:29 2017 From: lukeshu at lukeshu.com (Luke Shumaker) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Assist] Questions about parabola In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <87o9smbpru.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:06:29 -0400, Manuel Plavsic wrote: > > [1 ] > Hello, > > My name is Manuel and I lately my interest for Free software, and more > generally Freedom, has increased a lot. > I was planning to switch from Linux Mint Cinnamon to Parabola GNU > because I want to get rid of non-free software. > > I was wondering if after installing Parabola, if it will be possible to > install the right iwlwifi firmware for my Laptop Intel wireless card. I > mean, only in case the wifi doesn't work out of the box (I think that > you probably removed these iwlwifi firmwares from the kernel). Or maybe > you know a free software solution which is even better (my card is the > Intel AC 8260). The linux-libre kernel will not load non-free firmwares, even if you download and install them. It usually is fairly cheap and simple to replace the wifi card in a laptop with a freedom-respecting model. > Secondly, since I will be new to Parabola and I've never tried Arch > before, I was just wondering if you could give me some tips for the > installation. More precisely: what's the best way to do a Full Disk > Encryption with a new SSD and using UEFI (I guess i must type something > in the terminal while installing the system for the first time). I also > saw in a You Tube video that there is a GUI installer, could I use that > for the Full Disk Encryption? If you know a Parabola guide (or also a > Arch guide which is very similar) and you could send it to me, you would > really help me. We do have a GUI installer, but I've never used it. I suggest you ask the assist@ mailing list (which I've CC'd). > I'll attach my public key if you want to send me an encrypted email. > Thanks for your time! > > Cheers, Manu. > [2 0x74F74872.asc ] -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker From adfeno at openmailbox.org Sat Jul 15 23:26:12 2017 From: adfeno at openmailbox.org (Adonay Felipe Nogueira) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 19:26:12 -0300 Subject: [Assist] Questions about parabola In-Reply-To: <87o9smbpru.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> (Luke Shumaker's message of "Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:46:29 -0400") References: <87o9smbpru.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> Message-ID: <87bmolcp6j.fsf@openmailbox.org> Just for the sake of transparency and information: The issue with regards to kernsl that are made using the scripts from the GNU Linux-libre project refusing to load user-supplied non-free firmware even after successful installation is actually a *bug*, not a feature. The GNU Linux-libre project is aware of the bug. For more information see [[http://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/blogs/lxo/2013-11-08-linux-libre-interview-by-bruce-byfield.en.html]] (notice the answer to "Is there anything that the project wants to do that it can't do now? In general, what are the future plans for the project?"). Also, before soneone else starts this claim, I must point out that, contrary to common believe, Linux-libre kernels also work with newer hardware, it all depends on the exact model of the hardware and if there is free/libre firmware and modules to make it work, not it's age. -- - [[https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno]] - Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (n?o confundir com gratis). - "WhatsApp"? Ele n?o ? livre, por isso n?o uso. Iguais a ele prefiro GNU Ring, ou Tox. Quer outras formas de contato? Adicione o vCard que est? no endere?o acima aos teus contatos. - Pretende me enviar arquivos .doc, .ppt, .cdr, ou .mp3? OK, eu aceito, mas n?o repasso. Entrego apenas em formatos favor?veis ao /software/ livre. Favor entrar em contato em caso de d?vida. From edgar at openmail.cc Tue Jul 25 06:30:23 2017 From: edgar at openmail.cc (edgar at openmail.cc) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 05:30:23 +0000 Subject: [Assist] Help with Flake8 Message-ID: <852bea26045865f0e78c4fe03be6cc91@openmail.cc> Hello, I am remastering Parabola's MATE iso. One of my objectives is to have a Emacs running with elpy. For this, I need flake8. I installed it with pacman: $ pacman -S flake8 and I can run pyflakes on a file $ pyflakes /tmp/t.py but flake8 is not working: $ flake8 /tmp/t.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/flake8", line 11, in load_entry_point('flake8==3.3.0', 'console_scripts', 'flake8')() File "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/cli.py", line 16, in main app.run(argv) File "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/application.py", line 328, in run self._run(argv) File "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/application.py", line 315, in _run self.initialize(argv) File "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/application.py", line 303, in initialize self.make_file_checker_manager() File "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/application.py", line 229, in make_file_checker_manager checker_plugins=self.check_plugins, File "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/checker.py", line 89, in __init__ self.pool = multiprocessing.Pool(self.jobs, _pool_init) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/context.py", line 119, in Pool context=self.get_context()) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 156, in __init__ self._setup_queues() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 249, in _setup_queues self._inqueue = self._ctx.SimpleQueue() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/context.py", line 112, in SimpleQueue return SimpleQueue(ctx=self.get_context()) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 322, in __init__ self._rlock = ctx.Lock() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/context.py", line 67, in Lock return Lock(ctx=self.get_context()) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 163, in __init__ SemLock.__init__(self, SEMAPHORE, 1, 1, ctx=ctx) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 60, in __init__ unlink_now) OSError: [Errno 38] Function not implemented Ironically, my old flake8 (in my previous non-Parabola distribution) does work. The version in the Parabola chroot is 3.3.0 and the one in the "older" system is 3.2.1. Can anybody help me with this? I'm in a rush :S (sorry). Thanks. Edgar ------------------------------------------------- ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the NSA's hands! $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! 15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas! Commercial and Bulk Mail Options! From moritz at klammler.eu Wed Jul 26 12:17:41 2017 From: moritz at klammler.eu (Moritz Klammler) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:17:41 +0200 Subject: [Assist] File conflict between texlive-science and texlive-htmlxml Message-ID: I'm unable to successfully complete the update because of a file conflict on /usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/textgreek/textgreek.sty which the texlive-science package wants to install. Running pacman -Qo tells me that the existing file is owned by texlive-latexextra 2016.42294-1.parabola1. In case it matters: at the beginning of the update, pacman asked me whether I wanted to replace texlive-htmlxml with extra/texlive-formatsextra and I answered with the default "yes". I might just manually delete the file before running the update but I think that this is something that should be fixed nonetheless. -- Moritz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From edgar at openmail.cc Wed Jul 26 05:12:44 2017 From: edgar at openmail.cc (edgar at openmail.cc) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:12:44 +0000 Subject: [Assist] Help with Flake8 In-Reply-To: <852bea26045865f0e78c4fe03be6cc91@openmail.cc> References: <852bea26045865f0e78c4fe03be6cc91@openmail.cc> Message-ID: <53169a5358be3b21a234a14ac0ec46b7@openmail.cc> On 2017-07-25 05:30, edgar at openmail.cc wrote: > Hello, > > I am remastering Parabola's MATE iso. One of my objectives is to have > a Emacs running with elpy. For this, I need flake8. I installed it > with pacman: > > $ pacman -S flake8 > > and I can run pyflakes on a file > > $ pyflakes /tmp/t.py > > but flake8 is not working: > > $ flake8 /tmp/t.py > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/sbin/flake8", line 11, in > load_entry_point('flake8==3.3.0', 'console_scripts', 'flake8')() > File > "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/cli.py", > line 16, in main > app.run(argv) > File > "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/application.py", > line 328, in run > self._run(argv) > File > "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/application.py", > line 315, in _run > self.initialize(argv) > File > "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/application.py", > line 303, in initialize > self.make_file_checker_manager() > File > "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/main/application.py", > line 229, in make_file_checker_manager > checker_plugins=self.check_plugins, > File > "/home/parabola/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flake8/checker.py", > line 89, in __init__ > self.pool = multiprocessing.Pool(self.jobs, _pool_init) > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/context.py", line 119, in > Pool > context=self.get_context()) > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 156, in > __init__ > self._setup_queues() > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 249, in > _setup_queues > self._inqueue = self._ctx.SimpleQueue() > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/context.py", line 112, in > SimpleQueue > return SimpleQueue(ctx=self.get_context()) > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 322, in > __init__ > self._rlock = ctx.Lock() > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/context.py", line 67, in > Lock > return Lock(ctx=self.get_context()) > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 163, > in __init__ > SemLock.__init__(self, SEMAPHORE, 1, 1, ctx=ctx) > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 60, in > __init__ > unlink_now) > OSError: [Errno 38] Function not implemented > > Ironically, my old flake8 (in my previous non-Parabola distribution) > does work. The version in the Parabola chroot is 3.3.0 and the one in > the "older" system is 3.2.1. > > Can anybody help me with this? I'm in a rush :S (sorry). Thanks. > > > Edgar My problem was that I was running in a chroot, which prevented multiprocessing: https://github.com/mozilla/build-relengapi/issues/182 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6033599/oserror-38-errno-38-with-multiprocessing Solution: (in the directory where the chroot will happen, before issuing chroot .) mount -t tmpfs /dev/shm dev/shm mount -t tmpfs /run run [[-d run/shm ]] || mkdir run/shm sudo mount -t tmpfs /run/shm/ run/shm ------------------------------------------------- ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the NSA's hands! $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! 15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas! Commercial and Bulk Mail Options! From megver83 at openmailbox.org Thu Jul 27 00:39:04 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Assist] File conflict between texlive-science and texlive-htmlxml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <55292ba9-1b53-db84-8ed6-a0ad0dcdb5b6@openmailbox.org> just run pacman -Su --force El 26/07/17 a las 07:17, Moritz Klammler escribi?: > I'm unable to successfully complete the update because of a file > conflict on /usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/textgreek/textgreek.sty > which the texlive-science package wants to install. Running pacman -Qo > tells me that the existing file is owned by texlive-latexextra > 2016.42294-1.parabola1. In case it matters: at the beginning of the > update, pacman asked me whether I wanted to replace texlive-htmlxml with > extra/texlive-formatsextra and I answered with the default "yes". I > might just manually delete the file before running the update but I > think that this is something that should be fixed nonetheless. > > -- Moritz > > > > _______________________________________________ > Assist mailing list > Assist at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/assist > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: