From theroarofthedragon at gmail.com Fri May 1 01:02:16 2015 From: theroarofthedragon at gmail.com (Arun I) Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 05:32:16 +0530 Subject: [Assist] Installing from AUR is not endrorsed so, can somebody please add freefilesync to pcr In-Reply-To: <87zj5p74fl.fsf@abril.charola> References: <8f92c0775f96f21cb6a13fe69d683bcf@openmailbox.org> <20150429211800.ae69e5fd11351d59305b65b5@mailoo.org> <5541B9C1.5070106@riseup.net> <5541C074.8030900@riseup.net> <87zj5p74fl.fsf@abril.charola> Message-ID: <20150501000215.GA30362@steel> Is the PCR supposed to one day replace all of the AUR? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: not available URL: From alfplayer at mailoo.org Fri May 1 17:25:50 2015 From: alfplayer at mailoo.org (Esteban Carnevale) Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 13:25:50 -0300 Subject: [Assist] Installing from AUR is not endrorsed so, can somebody please add freefilesync to pcr In-Reply-To: <20150501000215.GA30362@steel> References: <8f92c0775f96f21cb6a13fe69d683bcf@openmailbox.org> <20150429211800.ae69e5fd11351d59305b65b5@mailoo.org> <5541B9C1.5070106@riseup.net> <5541C074.8030900@riseup.net> <87zj5p74fl.fsf@abril.charola> <20150501000215.GA30362@steel> Message-ID: <20150501132550.8da236d8ef9ec8e7aa56550f@mailoo.org> On Fri, 1 May 2015 05:32:16 +0530 Arun I wrote: > Is the PCR supposed to one day replace all of the AUR? We are going off-topic. PCR contains built packages, AUR contains source packages. This is not expected to change soon. I think Parabola needs a different repository for source packages (without built packages), so it could be created in the future. -- Esteban Carnevale From t4k at email.cz Mon May 11 00:19:31 2015 From: t4k at email.cz (Tom) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 00:19:31 +0100 Subject: [Assist] ec fonts In-Reply-To: References: <20150412170113.GA27532@zebra-laptop.karel> <877fth2ldx.fsf@mtjm.eu> <8738452l03.fsf@mtjm.eu> <20150415214746.GC7993@nil> Message-ID: <20150510231914.GA31935@nil> Hi again, as the ec fonts with a free license appear to be removed in the Parabola's texlive-core, I have installed the texlive-core from the Arch repositories. This is done by downloading texlive-core package from the Arch repositories [*], which can be then installed by # pacman -U texlive-core.pkg.tar.xz [*] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/texlive-core/ However, this solution is not without problems. The Arch website states as the license of this package GPL, but as found some parts are not under GPL e.g. the ec fonts are distributed with their own license. Although, in the case of ec fonts the license is still free, there is not guarantee that it will be so in other cases. Secondly, When I try to update my system (by pacman -Syu) the automatically replaced by the parabola version. Is there any way to force this particular package not to be changed? Many thanks, -- Tom On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:08:11PM +0100, Ramana Kumar wrote: > Indeed! Thanks Tom. So, even the FSF says the ec fonts are free, so > why are we removing them? (And how?) > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Tom wrote: > > It seems that the cm-super is already included as part of > > texlive-core, but the ec fonts are not part of that package (I'm sorry > > for the confusion). > > > > Instead, it seems, that those files are part of some other package, > > which seems to be missing in Parabola. I have found the following > > reference to the "ecrm" fonts in the list of files in the > > texlive-coreon the Arch website > > (https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/texlive-core/files/): > > > > usr/share/texmf-dist/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/ecrm1000.mf > > usr/share/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/jknappen/ec/ecrm1000.tfm > > > > I'm quite new here and am not sure, how exactly the packaging works > > and which package does provide those fonts then. But it seems to me, > > that the ec fonts are be free (see > > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ecfonts). > > > > -- > > Tom > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:30:01PM +0100, Ramana Kumar wrote: > >> Why are the three things, which are all quite difficult, required for Parabola, > >> when cm-super is already included in Trisquel? > >> > >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Micha? Mas?owski wrote: > >> > >> > Does anyone have any references/URLs related to this, i.e. where/how > >> > to take the next steps? > >> > >> See > >> e.g. https://wiki.parabola.nu/TeXLive_freedom_verification#MeX_license > >> for details of the license problem. > >> > >> > For example, does EC fonts have a homepage? Is the author's email > >> > address known? > >> > >> Search CTAN, all such info should be there. > >> > >> > How are they currently being removed from Parabola's TeXLive packages? > >> > >> Check mksource in the PKGBUILDs in abslibre.git. > >> > >> From ramana at member.fsf.org Mon May 11 06:19:33 2015 From: ramana at member.fsf.org (Ramana Kumar) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 06:19:33 +0100 Subject: [Assist] ec fonts In-Reply-To: <20150510231914.GA31935@nil> References: <20150412170113.GA27532@zebra-laptop.karel> <877fth2ldx.fsf@mtjm.eu> <8738452l03.fsf@mtjm.eu> <20150415214746.GC7993@nil> <20150510231914.GA31935@nil> Message-ID: One way to avoid it being replaced by the parabola version is to Ignore the package in your pacman.conf. But, the downside is you need to upgrade it manually (with -U). On 11 May 2015 at 00:19, Tom wrote: > Hi again, > > as the ec fonts with a free license appear to be removed in the > Parabola's texlive-core, I have installed the texlive-core from the > Arch repositories. > > This is done by downloading texlive-core package from the Arch > repositories [*], which can be then installed by > > # pacman -U texlive-core.pkg.tar.xz > > [*] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/texlive-core/ > > However, this solution is not without problems. > > The Arch website states as the license of this package GPL, but as > found some parts are not under GPL e.g. the ec fonts are distributed > with their own license. Although, in the case of ec fonts the license > is still free, there is not guarantee that it will be so in other > cases. > > Secondly, When I try to update my system (by pacman -Syu) the > automatically replaced by the parabola version. > > Is there any way to force this particular package not to be changed? > > Many thanks, > > -- > Tom > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:08:11PM +0100, Ramana Kumar wrote: > > Indeed! Thanks Tom. So, even the FSF says the ec fonts are free, so > > why are we removing them? (And how?) > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Tom wrote: > > > It seems that the cm-super is already included as part of > > > texlive-core, but the ec fonts are not part of that package (I'm sorry > > > for the confusion). > > > > > > Instead, it seems, that those files are part of some other package, > > > which seems to be missing in Parabola. I have found the following > > > reference to the "ecrm" fonts in the list of files in the > > > texlive-coreon the Arch website > > > (https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/texlive-core/files/): > > > > > > usr/share/texmf-dist/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/ecrm1000.mf > > > usr/share/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/jknappen/ec/ecrm1000.tfm > > > > > > I'm quite new here and am not sure, how exactly the packaging works > > > and which package does provide those fonts then. But it seems to me, > > > that the ec fonts are be free (see > > > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ecfonts). > > > > > > -- > > > Tom > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:30:01PM +0100, Ramana Kumar wrote: > > >> Why are the three things, which are all quite difficult, required for > Parabola, > > >> when cm-super is already included in Trisquel? > > >> > > >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Micha? Mas?owski > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Does anyone have any references/URLs related to this, i.e. > where/how > > >> > to take the next steps? > > >> > > >> See > > >> e.g. > https://wiki.parabola.nu/TeXLive_freedom_verification#MeX_license > > >> for details of the license problem. > > >> > > >> > For example, does EC fonts have a homepage? Is the author's > email > > >> > address known? > > >> > > >> Search CTAN, all such info should be there. > > >> > > >> > How are they currently being removed from Parabola's TeXLive > packages? > > >> > > >> Check mksource in the PKGBUILDs in abslibre.git. > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > Assist mailing list > Assist at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/assist > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anonymous01 at posteo.org Wed May 13 14:47:55 2015 From: anonymous01 at posteo.org (anonymous01 at posteo.org) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 15:47:55 +0200 Subject: [Assist] Migration failed Message-ID: <2858D13A-77E7-44B9-BD6F-F5DD55509B9F@posteo.org> Hello, I followed your official guide to migrate from Arch to Parabola, but unfortunately my system became unusable. I double checked every step, there were no errors and all packages including the kernel of course got updated to libre versions. your-freedom hasn't been installed yet, but besides Spotify and some unimportant userspace programs my system doesn't contain any other proprietary software which could possibly interfere with Parabola's boot process. The FOSS xf86-video-ati driver is used for my R9 280X, in addition to the official linux-libre there is another self compiled custom kernel, but after updating gummiboot's entries and rebuilding ramdisks both kernels won't boot but stuck at what seems to be the initialization of systemd. I can still access my system via an USB stick running an Arch ISO and ch-root into it, but I couldn't come up with any solution besides double checking everything again. Journalctl doesn't tell anything either, it just stops after loading the first units and hangs there forever. A couple of months ago I compiled the linux-libre kernel fron the AUR plus some patches just for fun and it would freeze at book the very same way, but as this was a fully working Arch system trying to tun a quickly build hobby kernel, it didn't bother me at all. After several hours of thinking and rechecking I even reverted my system back to proper Arch, namely replacing all libre packages again by updating against Arch's repositories, but with no avail. Now I am, again, back to Parabola - both wouldn't boot anyway, so I'd rather get Parabola running, haha. I therefore assume to have a kernel related issue. I will provide any config or log if necessary, but will only do so on request as getting them into these mails is a bit painful. Hopefully someone can help me, thanks in advance! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info Thu May 14 20:43:26 2015 From: isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info (Isaac David) Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Assist] Migration failed In-Reply-To: <2858D13A-77E7-44B9-BD6F-F5DD55509B9F@posteo.org> References: <2858D13A-77E7-44B9-BD6F-F5DD55509B9F@posteo.org> Message-ID: <1431632606.1009.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Given that linux-libre and even systemd boot normally I think it is safe to discard anything bootloader-related. I would suspect the video card or some other hardware peripheral. It's well-known that some nvidia cards make the video output freeze completely in a similar fashion to what you described. Try adding the parameter nomodeset to your kernel invocation line in the bootloader. If that doesn't do it try with acpi=off too. Or just take the video card away and boot. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:47 AM, anonymous01 at posteo.org wrote: > Hello, > > I followed your official guide to migrate from Arch to Parabola, but > unfortunately my system became unusable. > > I double checked every step, there were no errors and all packages > including the kernel of course got updated to libre versions. > > your-freedom hasn't been installed yet, but besides Spotify and some > unimportant userspace programs my system doesn't contain any other > proprietary software which could possibly interfere with Parabola's > boot process. > > The FOSS xf86-video-ati driver is used for my R9 280X, in addition to > the official linux-libre there is another self compiled custom > kernel, but after updating gummiboot's entries and rebuilding > ramdisks both kernels won't boot but stuck at what seems to be the > initialization of systemd. > > I can still access my system via an USB stick running an Arch ISO and > ch-root into it, but I couldn't come up with any solution besides > double checking everything again. > > Journalctl doesn't tell anything either, it just stops after loading > the first units and hangs there forever. > > A couple of months ago I compiled the linux-libre kernel fron the AUR > plus some patches just for fun and it would freeze at book the very > same way, but as this was a fully working Arch system trying to tun a > quickly build hobby kernel, it didn't bother me at all. > > After several hours of thinking and rechecking I even reverted my > system back to proper Arch, namely replacing all libre packages again > by updating against Arch's repositories, but with no avail. Now I am, > again, back to Parabola - both wouldn't boot anyway, so I'd rather > get Parabola running, haha. > > I therefore assume to have a kernel related issue. I will provide any > config or log if necessary, but will only do so on request as getting > them into these mails is a bit painful. > > Hopefully someone can help me, thanks in advance! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From apapilootoe at gmail.com Sun May 17 12:40:28 2015 From: apapilootoe at gmail.com (Adam Zaim) Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 19:40:28 +0800 Subject: [Assist] Cannot access to wiki.parabola.nu Message-ID: I've already installed some stuff and I can access to the website except the wiki. And that also means I can't download it. Help. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From elcorreo at deshackra.com Sun May 17 22:00:29 2015 From: elcorreo at deshackra.com (Jorge Araya Navarro) Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 15:00:29 -0600 Subject: [Assist] Cannot access to wiki.parabola.nu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <87oalij4wi.fsf@abril.charola> Everything is right here! https://wiki.parabola.nu/Main_Page Adam Zaim writes: > I've already installed some stuff and I can access to the website except > the wiki. And that also means I can't download it. Help. > _______________________________________________ > Assist mailing list > Assist at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/assist -- Pax et bonum. Jorge Araya Navarro. ES: Dise?ador Publicitario, Programador Python y colaborador en Parabola GNU/Linux-libre EN: Ads Designer, Python programmer and contributor Parabola GNU/Linux-libre EO: Anonco grafikisto, Pitino programalingvo programisto kai kontribuanto en Parabola GNU/Linux-libre https://es.gravatar.com/shackra From khoi at bknguyen.be Thu May 21 18:10:22 2015 From: khoi at bknguyen.be (Binh-Khoi Nguyen) Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 18:10:22 +0100 Subject: [Assist] [git-annex] error while loading shared libraries Message-ID: <20150521171022.GA7467@bkn> Hi, I encounter the following error when using git-annex: git-annex: error while loading shared libraries: libgnutls.so.28: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory fatal: 'annex' appears to be a git command, but we were not able to execute it. Maybe git-annex is broken? Can anyone help me? I think the package needs to be rebuilt? Thanks, -- Binh-Khoi NGUYEN khoi at member.fsf.org b.nguyen12 at imperial.ac.uk From emulatorman at riseup.net Fri May 22 09:52:07 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 05:52:07 -0300 Subject: [Assist] [git-annex] error while loading shared libraries In-Reply-To: <20150521171022.GA7467@bkn> References: <20150521171022.GA7467@bkn> Message-ID: <555EEE37.4080106@riseup.net> On 05/21/2015 02:10 PM, Binh-Khoi Nguyen wrote: > Hi, > > I encounter the following error when using git-annex: > > git-annex: error while loading shared libraries: libgnutls.so.28: cannot > open shared object file: No such file or directory > fatal: 'annex' appears to be a git command, but we were not > able to execute it. Maybe git-annex is broken? > > Can anyone help me? I think the package needs to be rebuilt? > > Thanks, > Yes, i think the package needs be rebuilt, don't worry i'll do it -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From khoi at bknguyen.be Fri May 22 12:16:07 2015 From: khoi at bknguyen.be (Binh-Khoi Nguyen) Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 12:16:07 +0100 Subject: [Assist] [git-annex] error while loading shared libraries In-Reply-To: <555EEE37.4080106@riseup.net> References: <20150521171022.GA7467@bkn> <555EEE37.4080106@riseup.net> Message-ID: <20150522111607.GA9466@bkn.home> Thanks! On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 05:52:07AM -0300, Andr? Silva wrote: >On 05/21/2015 02:10 PM, Binh-Khoi Nguyen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I encounter the following error when using git-annex: >> >> git-annex: error while loading shared libraries: libgnutls.so.28: cannot >> open shared object file: No such file or directory >> fatal: 'annex' appears to be a git command, but we were not >> able to execute it. Maybe git-annex is broken? >> >> Can anyone help me? I think the package needs to be rebuilt? >> >> Thanks, >> >Yes, i think the package needs be rebuilt, don't worry i'll do it > > >_______________________________________________ >Assist mailing list >Assist at lists.parabola.nu >https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/assist -- Binh-Khoi NGUYEN khoi at member.fsf.org b.nguyen12 at imperial.ac.uk From khoi at bknguyen.be Sat May 30 15:36:43 2015 From: khoi at bknguyen.be (Binh-Khoi Nguyen) Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 15:36:43 +0100 Subject: [Assist] [git-annex] error while loading shared libraries In-Reply-To: <555EEE37.4080106@riseup.net> References: <20150521171022.GA7467@bkn> <555EEE37.4080106@riseup.net> Message-ID: <20150530143643.7309.66545@bkn-laptop.bknguyen.be> Hi, Sorry for the reminder, but I still can't use git-annex. Would it be possible for it to be rebuilt? Cheers, Khoi Quoting Andr? Silva (2015-05-22 09:52:07) > On 05/21/2015 02:10 PM, Binh-Khoi Nguyen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I encounter the following error when using git-annex: > > > > git-annex: error while loading shared libraries: libgnutls.so.28: cannot > > open shared object file: No such file or directory > > fatal: 'annex' appears to be a git command, but we were not > > able to execute it. Maybe git-annex is broken? > > > > Can anyone help me? I think the package needs to be rebuilt? > > > > Thanks, > > > Yes, i think the package needs be rebuilt, don't worry i'll do it > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Assist mailing list > Assist at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/assist From rudolf.dovicin at gmail.com Sat May 30 16:30:59 2015 From: rudolf.dovicin at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?UnVkb2xmIERvdmnEjcOtbg==?=) Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 17:30:59 +0200 Subject: [Assist] "X Y" is unknown trust, parabola-keyring does not help Message-ID: I cannot actualise my computer with Parabola. (I had actualised it many times before without problems.) First command # pacman -Syu gived me cca 80 packages to actualise, I saw archlinux-keyring between them, so I broke full actualisation and tried separately first: # pacman -Sy archlinux-keyring Next command # pacman -Syu gives me errors: error: linux-libre-api-headers: signature from "Andr? Silva " is unknown trust :: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-libre-api-headers-4.0_gnu-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)). Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] n error: iceweasel: signature from "Andr? Silva " is unknown trust :: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/iceweasel-1:38.0.1.deb5-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)). Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] n error: mesa-libcl: signature from "Andr? Silva " is unknown trust :: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/mesa-libcl-10.5.6-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)). Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] n error: linux-libre: signature from "Andr? Silva " is unknown trust :: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-libre-4.0.4_gnu-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)). Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] n error: pacman-mirrorlist: signature from "Andr? Silva " is unknown trust :: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/pacman-mirrorlist-20150530-1.parabola1-any.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)). Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] n error: texlive-bin: signature from "Andr? Silva " is unknown trust :: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/texlive-bin-2014.34260-8.parabola1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)). Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] n (It seem to me that other signatures does not gives such error.) What can be wrong? (And how can I try to solve it?) Best regards: -- Rudolf Dovi??n Partiz?nska 1506/92-34 957 01 B?novce nad Bebravou 1 SLOVENSKO xmpp: ruwolf at jabbim.sk (cellular: +421 940 872 846, short messages only) From emulatorman at riseup.net Sat May 30 18:09:43 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFNpbHZh?=) Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 14:09:43 -0300 Subject: [Assist] [git-annex] error while loading shared libraries In-Reply-To: <20150530143643.7309.66545@bkn-laptop.bknguyen.be> References: <20150521171022.GA7467@bkn> <555EEE37.4080106@riseup.net> <20150530143643.7309.66545@bkn-laptop.bknguyen.be> Message-ID: <5569EED7.6000502@riseup.net> On 05/30/2015 11:36 AM, Binh-Khoi Nguyen wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the reminder, but I still can't use git-annex. Would it be > possible for it to be rebuilt? > > Cheers, > Khoi > I'm trying rebuild it, but a failure occurred in the building [0]. I think that we should upgrade the source first, maybe fauno could help us because he's the git-annex-static maintainer. [0]:http://ix.io/iPQ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From emulatorman at riseup.net Sat May 30 18:14:59 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFNpbHZh?=) Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 14:14:59 -0300 Subject: [Assist] "X Y" is unknown trust, parabola-keyring does not help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5569F013.7060602@riseup.net> On 05/30/2015 12:30 PM, Rudolf Dovi??n wrote: > What can be wrong? (And how can I try to solve it?) > Did you tried "pacman-key --refresh-keys"? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From emulatorman at riseup.net Sun May 31 23:55:47 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFNpbHZh?=) Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 19:55:47 -0300 Subject: [Assist] "X Y" is unknown trust, parabola-keyring does not help In-Reply-To: References: <5569F013.7060602@riseup.net> Message-ID: <556B9173.1060401@riseup.net> On 05/30/2015 02:49 PM, Rudolf Dovi??n wrote: > 2015-05-30 19:14 GMT+02:00 Andr? Silva : >> Did you tried "pacman-key --refresh-keys"? > > Now I have tried it and it gives me error: > # pacman-key --refresh-keys > gpg: keyserver refresh failed: No keyserver available > ==> ERROR: A specified local key could not be updated from a keyserver. > > (Connections to Internet seems to be OK - I am sending this email > message from this computer through Web.) > try: pacman-key --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --refresh-keys or pacman-key --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --refresh-keys or pacman-key --keyserver http://http-keys.gnupg.net --refresh-keys -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: